![]() ![]() The STOPP/START criteria were retrospectively applied to patients' medication regimens pre and post iSIMPATHY review. Main outcome measures: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) were collected pre and post review as per iSIMPATHY protocol. ![]() Data was independently reviewed and analysed by the Medication Safety, Quality Improvement Division at Health Service Executive, Ireland. The first 100 iSIMPATHY reviews actioned by the GPs and for which post review PROM data was collected were included. Patients were contacted by phone and offered iSIMPATHY reviews and consented to data collection. Lists of eligible patients aged ≥ 65 years and on ≥ 10 regular medications were generated from practice software. Method: This study was conducted across 3 General Practice (GP) practice sites. The relationship between reductions in PIP and improvements in the iSIMPATHY Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) was also explored. The objective of this study was to investigate the extent of reduction in PIP achieved by Shared Decision Making (SDM) employed by pharmacists delivering, comprehensive, person-centred medication reviews as part of the EU INTERREG-VA funded iSIMPATHY project. Kinahan 1,* on behalf of iSIMPATHY 1Health Service Executive, Ireland, CHO 1, Irelandīackground and Objective: Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing (PIP) as identified by STOPP/START criteria is associated with increased healthcare utilistation 1. ORAL COMMUNICATION I OC-1.1 A study of the impact of shared decision making on potentially inappropriate prescribing C. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |